Intercourse could be the glue that holds relationships together.
This is actually the legislation of diminishing comes back; at what point could be the yield out-valued because of the work had a need to create it? That you are ignoring other, potentially better, opportunities in exchange for your attention and effort if you allow yourself to be put into a holding pattern with a â€œtake it slowâ€ woman you will ALWAYS expend more effort than the reward yield, if for no other reason than.
The â€œtake it slowâ€ methodology capitalizes on a guyâ€™s insecurity for the reason that it automatically puts him into a consistent place of qualifying himself to your woman during the chance of their reputation. Easily put, it slow (i.e forces the issue, pleads his case too emphatically) OR he ejects altogether, he risks becoming who she, conveniently, â€œfears he really isâ€, a Player only interested in getting in her panties if he doesnâ€™t take. No matter what the outcome itâ€™s a self-fulfilling social convention that protects a womanâ€™s ego. Though the converse with this is which he wastes their own resources (time, possibility, attention, cash) indefinitely while wanting to negotiate terms for just what he believes is her genuine desire. Eventually, presuming there is one, the reward (which initially is definitely intercourse) will never out-value the fee of this investment.
A guy getting this response is one of multiple options sheâ€™s entertaining at the time and will conveniently be dismissed if a higher value guy becomes viable for her (i.e. the hot guy in Cancun) in most instances. You might say this â€œtake it slowâ€ contrivance is an equivalent, but more manipulative version of the LJBF rejection. When you look at the TIS technique there is certainly an implied presumption that a guy â€œmayâ€ qualify on her behalf closeness himself to be patient and match her set of prerequisites IF he can prove.